An estimated 231,000 homes in England remain effectively unsellable in 2026 due to unresolved cladding and fire safety concerns — a figure that underlines just how deeply the post-Grenfell building safety crisis continues to distort the residential property market [4]. For buyers, sellers, lenders, and the surveyors caught in the middle, valuations for properties with fire safety uncertainty: how surveyors handle EWS1, cladding, and remediation schemes has become one of the most technically demanding and professionally sensitive challenges in modern property practice.
This article explains how qualified valuers produce defensible market values where information about fire risk, remediation funding, and building safety status is partial, contested, or simply absent — and what that means for anyone transacting in medium- and high-rise blocks today.
Key Takeaways 📋
- EWS1 forms are not legally required but remain a practical gateway to mortgage lending on many multi-storey blocks, directly affecting valuations.
- RICS published an updated valuation standard for clad residential buildings, effective 1 November 2026, replacing earlier interim guidance [1][7].
- Surveyors must apply a Material Valuation Uncertainty (MVU) clause when fire safety status cannot be confirmed, protecting both lender and borrower.
- Government remediation schemes — including the Building Safety Fund and developer pledges — can materially improve a property's value once confirmed, but only when evidence is documented.
- A proportionate, evidence-led approach is now central to RICS methodology, meaning not every flat in a cladded block will automatically receive a zero or suppressed valuation.
Understanding the Fire Safety Valuation Landscape in 2026
The cladding crisis did not emerge overnight. Following the Grenfell Tower fire in 2017, mortgage lenders, surveyors, and regulators scrambled to understand the scale of combustible materials on residential blocks across the UK. By 2026, the legislative and guidance framework has matured considerably — but the practical challenges for valuers remain significant [10].
What Is an EWS1 Form and Why Does It Matter?
The External Wall System (EWS1) form was introduced in December 2019 as a joint initiative by UK Finance, the Building Societies Association, and RICS. It is a declaration by a qualified professional — typically a fire engineer or chartered surveyor with specialist competence — confirming the fire risk category of a building's external wall system [6].
The form uses a simple rating system:
| Rating | Meaning | Typical Lending Impact |
|---|---|---|
| A1 | No combustible materials — no further action | Mortgage usually available |
| A2 | Combustible materials present — low risk | Mortgage usually available |
| B1 | Combustible materials — remediation not required | Mortgage usually available |
| B2 | Combustible materials — remediation required | Mortgage often refused or restricted |
💡 Pull Quote: "An EWS1 rating of B2 does not automatically mean a property is worthless — but it does mean a valuer must carefully assess what remediation is planned, funded, and likely to complete."
Critically, EWS1 is not a legal requirement under the Building Safety Act 2022. However, lenders frequently request it before agreeing to lend on flats in multi-storey blocks, making it a de facto market requirement [6].
The Scale of the Problem in 2026
Government data published in March 2026 shows that while remediation progress has accelerated, thousands of buildings are still working through assessment, funding applications, or active works [8]. The Building Safety Fund, the Cladding Safety Scheme, and developer remediation contracts under the Building Safety Act have together committed substantial resources — but completion timelines vary enormously between buildings.
For a valuer, this creates a spectrum of scenarios:
- Buildings with confirmed funding and active works underway
- Buildings with funding agreed but works not yet started
- Buildings awaiting assessment with no EWS1 in place
- Buildings where the responsible developer has signed a remediation contract
- Buildings where no clear remediation pathway has been identified
Each scenario demands a different valuation approach.
How Surveyors Handle Valuations for Properties With Fire Safety Uncertainty
The core challenge in valuations for properties with fire safety uncertainty is producing a number that is both defensible and useful — one that a lender can rely on, a buyer can understand, and a court could scrutinise if necessary. RICS-registered valuers are bound by the Red Book (RICS Valuation — Global Standards), and the updated 2026 cladding standard sits within that framework [1].
For those seeking a RICS Red Book valuation on a flat in a cladded block, the process is more involved than a standard residential valuation.
The Material Valuation Uncertainty Clause
When a valuer cannot confirm the fire safety status of a building — because no EWS1 exists, because remediation is incomplete, or because the scope of works is unclear — they are required to include a Material Valuation Uncertainty (MVU) declaration in their report. This clause, set out in RICS guidance, signals to the client and lender that:
- The valuation has been prepared on the best available evidence
- Market conditions or building-specific factors mean the figure carries greater uncertainty than normal
- The value could move materially once further information is available
This is not a disclaimer to avoid liability — it is a professional obligation to be transparent. A well-drafted MVU clause actually strengthens a valuation report by demonstrating that the surveyor has properly identified and disclosed the risk.
Proportionality: Not Every Cladded Building Is the Same
A major shift in the 2026 RICS standard is the emphasis on proportionality [2][7]. Earlier guidance was sometimes applied too broadly, resulting in blanket suppressed valuations or mortgage refusals on buildings that posed minimal actual risk. The updated standard requires valuers to consider:
- Building height — blocks under 11 metres are generally outside the highest-risk category
- Construction type and cladding material — ACM (aluminium composite material) panels carry different risk profiles than other systems
- Presence or absence of sprinklers and other fire safety measures
- Status of any remediation programme
- Whether the building is enrolled in a government scheme or covered by a developer pledge
This proportionate approach means a chartered surveyor must gather considerably more building-specific evidence before arriving at a figure.
Comparable Evidence and Market Adjustment
Valuers use comparable sales evidence as their primary tool, but in buildings with fire safety uncertainty, finding truly comparable transactions is difficult. Where comparables exist within the same block or similar affected buildings, they provide the most direct evidence of what the market will pay given the known risks.
Where comparables are limited, valuers apply a risk-adjusted approach:
- Establish the unencumbered value (what the property would be worth with a clean EWS1)
- Apply a discount reflecting the current uncertainty, remediation cost, and likely timeline
- Document the reasoning transparently in the report
The size of any discount is not arbitrary — it should reflect actual market evidence of how buyers and lenders are pricing similar uncertainty in comparable transactions [5].
Remediation Schemes and Their Impact on Valuations for Properties With Fire Safety Uncertainty
Government-backed and developer-funded remediation schemes have created a new layer of complexity — and opportunity — in valuations for properties with fire safety uncertainty: how surveyors handle EWS1, cladding, and remediation schemes.
Key Remediation Routes in 2026
🏗️ Building Safety Fund (BSF)
Covers remediation of unsafe non-ACM cladding on buildings 18 metres and above. Government data confirms ongoing funding releases, though application processing and contractor availability continue to create delays [8].
🏗️ Cladding Safety Scheme (CSS)
Extended coverage to buildings between 11 and 18 metres, addressing a significant gap in earlier policy.
🏗️ Developer Remediation Contracts
Under the Building Safety Act 2022, major housebuilders signed legally binding commitments to remediate buildings they developed or refurbished. By 2026, many of these works are in progress, though completion rates vary by developer [10].
🏗️ Responsible Actors Scheme
Developers who refuse to sign remediation contracts face restrictions on operating in the UK housing market — a significant enforcement lever.
How Surveyors Factor Remediation Into Valuations
The existence of a confirmed remediation scheme can materially affect a valuation, but only when properly evidenced. A surveyor will look for:
- ✅ Written confirmation of BSF or CSS funding approval
- ✅ A signed developer remediation contract
- ✅ A documented works programme with realistic completion dates
- ✅ Confirmation that leaseholders will bear no remediation costs (as required under the Building Safety Act for qualifying buildings)
Where all of the above are confirmed, a valuer may be able to value the property closer to its unencumbered market value, with a smaller or no discount for fire safety risk — because the risk has effectively been transferred to the remediation programme [5][9].
Where evidence is partial or absent, the MVU clause applies and the valuation will reflect the residual uncertainty.
The Leaseholder Protections and Their Valuation Significance
The Building Safety Act 2022 introduced strong protections for qualifying leaseholders, capping or eliminating their liability for remediation costs in many circumstances. This is directly relevant to valuation because it affects the financial exposure of the buyer [10].
A RICS valuation surveyor must confirm whether the property and its leaseholders qualify for these protections before applying any cost-related discount. If a buyer faces zero remediation liability, the valuation case for a deep discount weakens considerably.
The Updated RICS Standard Effective November 2026
RICS published its revised professional standard — Valuation of Properties in Multi-Storey, Multi-Occupancy Residential Buildings with Cladding — with an effective date of 1 November 2026 [1][7]. This replaces the previous interim guidance that had been in place since 2021 and reflects lessons learned from thousands of valuations carried out under the earlier framework.
Key changes in the 2026 standard include:
- Clearer guidance on proportionality — valuers must justify applying uncertainty clauses and cannot do so as a blanket precaution
- Stronger emphasis on evidence gathering — surveyors are expected to actively seek remediation status information, not simply note its absence
- Updated comparable evidence methodology — recognising that a growing body of post-remediation transaction data now exists
- Alignment with the Building Safety Act 2022 framework — incorporating leaseholder protections into the valuation methodology [2]
💡 Pull Quote: "The 2026 RICS standard signals a shift from precautionary blanket uncertainty to evidence-led, proportionate assessment — a significant step toward unlocking the stalled market."
For anyone commissioning a RICS valuation on a flat in a cladded block, understanding this updated standard is essential. It sets the professional benchmark against which any valuation report will be measured.
Practical Steps for Buyers, Sellers, and Lenders
Understanding how surveyors approach these valuations helps all parties prepare more effectively.
For Buyers 🏠
- Request the EWS1 form from the seller or managing agent before commissioning a valuation — this saves time and cost
- Confirm remediation status in writing from the building owner or responsible developer
- Check leaseholder protection eligibility under the Building Safety Act — your solicitor can advise
- Commission a valuation from a surveyor with demonstrable experience in cladding-affected buildings; consider a full building survey for additional assurance
- Understand that an MVU clause in your valuation report does not necessarily mean the property is unmortgageable
For Sellers 🏢
- Gather all available documentation: EWS1 form, funding confirmation letters, developer correspondence, and works programmes
- Proactively share this with prospective buyers and their surveyors
- Be realistic about pricing — a property with a B2 rating and no confirmed remediation route will be discounted by the market regardless of asking price
For Lenders 🏦
- Follow the UK Finance industry statement on cladding, which sets out a consistent approach to lending decisions [6]
- Recognise that a valuation with an MVU clause is a professionally compliant response, not a failure of the valuation process
- Work with RICS-registered valuers who are up to date with the November 2026 standard
Regional Considerations
The cladding crisis is concentrated in urban areas with significant high-rise residential stock. London — particularly areas like Central London, East London, and North London — has the highest density of affected buildings. Manchester, Birmingham, Leeds, and other major cities also have substantial numbers of blocks under assessment or in remediation.
Valuers operating in these markets need not only technical knowledge of the RICS standard but also local market intelligence about how fire safety uncertainty is being priced in their specific area. A discount applied in a highly liquid London market may differ from one applied in a regional city where transaction volumes are lower and comparable evidence is thinner.
Conclusion: Actionable Next Steps
Valuations for properties with fire safety uncertainty: how surveyors handle EWS1, cladding, and remediation schemes is no longer a niche specialism — it is a core competence for any surveyor working in the multi-storey residential sector in 2026.
The updated RICS standard effective November 2026 provides a clearer, more proportionate framework that should, over time, help unblock the tens of thousands of transactions currently stalled by fire safety concerns. But the standard only works if all parties — surveyors, lenders, developers, and government — play their part in providing and sharing the evidence that valuers need.
Here are the key actions to take right now:
- Check your building's remediation status — contact the building owner, managing agent, or search the government's remediation database
- Obtain or update the EWS1 form — ensure it reflects the current state of any works
- Commission a valuation from a RICS-registered surveyor familiar with the November 2026 standard; explore valuation costs and options before instructing
- Understand your leaseholder protections — legal advice here can directly affect the valuation outcome
- Do not accept a suppressed valuation without scrutiny — ask the surveyor to explain their reasoning and evidence base in writing
The property market cannot fully recover from the cladding crisis until valuations are both accurate and trusted. With the right expertise and the right evidence, that goal is achievable.
References
[1] Valuation Of Properties In Multi Storey Multi Occupancy Residential Buildings With Cladding – https://www.rics.org/profession-standards/rics-standards-and-guidance/sector-standards/valuation-standards/valuation-of-properties-in-multi-storey-multi-occupancy-residential-buildings-with-cladding
[2] Rics Releases Updated Home Valuation Guidance For Flats In Buildings With Cladding – https://bebeez.eu/2026/05/14/rics-releases-updated-home-valuation-guidance-for-flats-in-buildings-with-cladding/
[4] Cladding Scandal 2026 Update 231000 Unsellable Homes – https://www.propertysolvers.co.uk/youtube/cladding-scandal-2026-update-231000-unsellable-homes/
[5] How Valuation Guidelines On Cladding May Help Ease Delays For Buyers And Sellers Of Flats – https://www.savills.co.uk/blog/article/316554/residential-property/how-valuation-guidelines-on-cladding-may-help-ease-delays-for-buyers-and-sellers-of-flats.aspx
[6] Industry Statement Cladding – https://www.ukfinance.org.uk/policy-and-guidance/guidance/industry-statement-cladding
[7] Rics Publishes Updated Standard On Valuations For Clad Residential Buildings – https://www.thefpa.co.uk/news/rics-publishes-updated-standard-on-valuations-for-clad-residential-buildings-
[8] Building Safety Remediation Technical Note March 2026 – https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/building-safety-remediation-monthly-data-release-march-2026/building-safety-remediation-technical-note-march-2026
[9] Fire Safety Building Surveys Post 2026 Regulations Cladding Remediation And Compliance For Residential Valuations – https://princesurveyors.co.uk/blog/fire-safety-building-surveys-post-2026-regulations-cladding-remediation-and-compliance-for-residential-valuations/
[10] Cbp 10763 – https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10763/












